<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://dotnet-forum.de/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Stripping down a convoluted LINQ expression</title><link>http://dotnet-forum.de/blogs/rainerhilmer/archive/2009/10/30/stripping-down-a-convoluted-linq-expression.aspx</link><description>This is part 3 of my Blog posts about LINQ testability issues. You know what this is all about when you have read the other two parts here and here . Before I get down to the nitty gritty let me say thank you to Rainer Schuster who has been faster than</description><dc:language /><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Lambda Expressions: Warum ich denke daß sie schnell gegen CCD –Prinzipien verstoßen</title><link>http://dotnet-forum.de/blogs/rainerhilmer/archive/2009/10/30/stripping-down-a-convoluted-linq-expression.aspx#32221</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:16:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dcdb6ae-26a7-4704-ae8b-cbd278e59bdf:32221</guid><dc:creator>Rainer Hilmers Developer-Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oft wird mir etwas unwohl wenn ich eine Lambda expression sehe. Lange Zeit wu&amp;#223;te ich nur vage warum &amp;#252;berhaupt&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://dotnet-forum.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32221" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>